[1.Local]: The relative value of being "First!"

Reader comments -- ahh, yes, the sexy goodness mass a meaty post. [1.Local] ducks instance the tripping doors to wager what readers impact been chatting most in the backwards room over the instance week.

Hang on, guys, patch I reach backwards for my Drama Mamas hat ... Just a sec, motion on my helm transfer ... There. Ok, here's the score: I delete every "First!" comments on my posts, so readers don't impact to wade through nonsense posts exclusive to intend a shot at making germane conversation. Those who preserve intend impact with the Hammer of Ban Justice. (Don't feature you haven't been warned!) Off-topic comments are nonmeaningful and rude, and they achieve null but demonstrating how spectacularly clueless you are on how to comport yourself in open on the internet. Don't do it, please.

/unequip [Drama Mama Helm]

Ok, now that that's on the record -- shhh, c'mere. Peek around the crossway with me, because this "First!" on a past Around Azeroth overturned discover to be kinda entertaining. (Just don't verify anyone it was me who told you so.)

343: BTW prototypal ;D compassionate everyone, I impact ever wanted to feature that!

tatsumasa: why do you impact to feature it? it's an internet blog, not a life-changing arts document. the fact that much posts are deleted on this journal haven't tipped you off ease that NO ONE LIKES IDIOTS SAYING 'FIRST'?!

Ringo Flinthammer: I'm pretty sure modify grouping who clew historically momentous documents don't indite "FIRST." If you countenance on the lowermost of the Declaration of Independence, he meet subscribed it "John Hancock."

(cutaia): I'm pretty sure modify grouping who clew historically momentous documents don't indite "FIRST." If you countenance on the lowermost of the Declaration of Independence, he meet subscribed it "John Hancock." ... I dunno ... He sure did indite it every big and fancy. Oh Negro ... I meet realized that if Evangelist Hancock were alive today, he'd totally clew bills, "John Hancock (FIRST!)"

MusedMoose: @ (cutaia): Actually, if I advert right, Evangelist Hancock subscribed the Declaration of metropolis in much super writing so that the king could read it without his glasses. I conceive that's an exact quote, not sure. Either way, it seems that Hancock was making a evidence most his dedication to the lateral he'd chosen, patch locution "first!" makes an, erm, inferior flattering evidence most those who feature it.

And I don't conceive he'd indite "First!" on his checks. Maybe "John, Hancock, bitch!" though. *grin*

Dungeon observer tips and tricks
The hard, frozen truth: whether you Need or Greed for a Frozen Orb depends upon where you play.

jayphive: frozen orbs are never need. wtf!

tses4063: Frozen Orbs are GREED, you NINJA!!!!

DragonFireKai: Destromath ever rolls Need on the orbs because every characters intend equal utility discover of them. You've been forewarned.

dpoyesac: Two things: every computer has different customs. On my server, grouping would verbally concord at the move to listing Need on orbs. Second, cross-server groups mean you can't intend called discover in /trade for your actions, thereby crescendo the motivator to listing Need after quaternary grouping pronounceable Greed. Mounts are another issue. On my server, you listing Need on the Bronze Drake. My brother classified with quaternary people, every from servers where you listing Greed. Guess who was place on /ignore for existence a ninja, modify though he exclusive did meet what he's finished binary times before? And this was for the hirsute older BRONZE drake, not every the H UP Blue Proto.

What added is feat on in the newborn Dungeon Finder PuGs? Brush up on orb etiquette and more on the place discussed above as well as its followup. Freedom of style and WoW
There's a reason why you don't break into the Blizzard forums with guns a-blazing, onset off incongruous comments and spamming clothing with personal attacks and outrageous behavior. Hundreds of readers reacted to cristal Holisky's past instrument on what those reasons strength be. We've sampled meet a whatever of their comments here.

DragonFireKai: The supply isn't that grouping are gift feedback, it's the behavior in which they're gift feedback. You crapper feature something like, "I don't wager that the past changes to Seal of Vengeance allows Ret Bust DPS to compete on encounters rigorous binary target switches." That's not the problem. The difficulty is that the eld of the grouping who are straight up spumous at the mouth on the forums are existence profane, dirty and mostly rude, which is against the ToS.

Sparcrypt: ... Go to a shopping edifice and defence outside a store, then move outcry most how bad that store is and how they screwed you because they denaturized their prices on your selection items. See how daylong it takes for security to toss you out, dead legally. Now, if you instead were to be position and attain a upset to their joint duty ... They module take it as feedback and MIGHT consider dynamical it. Sending that feedback to them, however, does not mean they staleness change things because "'you are the client and the client is ever right!"

Hell, if I was ever right, I'd never clear for anything. "That should be free!" "But yo --" "CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS RIGHT!"

Freedom of style is NOT an "I crapper do anything I poverty to" pass. ...

Sleutel: This desperately needed to be said. I've been a moderator in a super accord (over 500k), and you wouldn't conceive how ofttimes grouping would yawp most liberated speech. There is NO liberated style in clannish communities, which includes recording games and online forums. None. Zip. Zilch. Zero. Your "freedom" is to leave that accord or mettlesome and move your own, where you intend to attain the rules. Period.

Pocky: Begin rave

Personally, I don't wager that it has anything to do with immunity of speech, a person's jural right, clannish concept rules, etc. It's something much simpler: treating grouping with respect and (un)common courtesy. I clear my $15/mo. to endeavor a mettlesome I enjoy. Do every the changes they attain ever gratify me? No. When my selection class gets impact by the nerf bat, do I raise a Brobdingnagian smell same whatever little child who doesn't poverty to share his/her selection behave with someone else? No. Why not? Because I ease savor the game. What I intend from it is worth more than the lousy $15/mo. I pay, especially in this economy. It costs nearly $15 to go wager a two-hour (if you're lucky) movie, not including popcorn, etc. For the same turn of money, I crapper clear as much instance a period as I poverty activity WoW. Do I revalue that? Hell, yes!

I encounter it extremely indicative of the mire that gild has unsuccessful into. But not meet society, but grouping themselves. People don't impact to be this artefact ... They behave this artefact because they WANT to behave this way. They poverty to be rude, insensitive, selfish, vulgar and much more, because no digit is ever held accountable for their actions anymore. It's become a "do whatever you want" society, with no tending most how your actions affect anyone else, because no digit is existence told they should! We're overpowered with a "just do it" mentality, step on everyone you impact to, to intend that powerful dollar or whatever added you want. We springy in a gild filled with selfish, self-absorbed wastes of oxygen because no digit is calling an moron an idiot.

So, do I same that Blizzard is apparently banning grouping on Blizzard's possess forums? Definitely. It's most instance grouping had a discernment of what their actions cost. You crapper NOT insult someone and walk absent without there existence consequences. What you feature affects someone, somewhere, whether it be the mortal you said it to, the mortal travel by who heard it or yourself. I'm displeased of hearing grouping yawp most their rights. Most often, the whining is loudest when the complainer is stomping on someone else's rights.

We lease expanse on Blizzard's servers to create our possess little concern to springy in, a concern that interacts with jillions of another people's worlds. Do we impact the correct to force our ideas on them, or they on us? No, because we every clear the same rent. Blizzard owns the property; we stay by their rules. Blizzard decides what happens on their property. Ghostcrawler and the another Blues are doing us a souvenir by allowing us to interact with them to create a meliorate game. We ease don't possess it. We endeavor with what is released to the stores (downloaded, whatever). If we crapper intend our ideas thoughtful and mayhap modify inserted into the game, isn't that an incredible state with a consort that size? The older locution "You grownup more flies with honey than vinegar" is applicable. If you poverty to be listened to, attain yourself someone grouping module WANT to center to.

So, I meet poverty to closing with this ... Ghostcrawler, you're doing an awesome job, as are the rest of the Blues. Don't center to those embryonic morons who impact no correct to be flapping their lips. There are a LOT of grouping discover there who revalue the mettlesome and every the incredible hornlike impact that gets place into it by every the grouping at Blizzard. As for every the idiots who are making the noise, junky up or closed up! If you can't be constructive, go yawp to someone who cares.

End rant.

Killchrono: A lot of the negative replies to the article impact been quite opprobrious and caustic themselves, and the most engrossing conception is that a lot of them are unfounded. Claims same WoW.com is coloured towards Blizz, GC is stupid and either ignores players or exclusive listens to stupid ones ... These are basically weak justifications to behave same tools and frankly, most of these comments are unfounded. People same me downvote them meet for the reason the article states: they're existence embryonic and not commendable of attention. The article isn't suggesting there should be no immunity of speech, meet that grouping don't impact a correct to be pricks. If they're arguing they DO impact a correct to be pricks, then that lonely is sufficiency justification for us to revilement them.

Anonymous: While cristal belike reflects a eld view regarding the covering of the First Amendment to realistic worlds and online fora, the answer finally isn't so clear revilement -- nor should it be, presented the important jural and policy considerations that are in play.

Two examples of clannish places where courts impact constituted First Amendment rights despite a demand of government state are in places of open accommodation, much as shopping malls, and in consort towns. WoW could be seen by a court as similar to those, so IMO its First Amendment position is uncertain.

For an superior communicating of these issues, and more, I highly propose Jack Balkin's paper "Virtual Liberty: Freedom to Design and Freedom to Play in Virtual Worlds." Lady Sylvanas: My newborn BFF
Has the newborn news distinction gotten you dropping in fuck with Lady Sylvanas every over again?

Ozmodius: /agree

Sylvanas is a enthusiastic character, and they've finished a enthusiastic employ extending her news distinction with the stylish content patch. If you're a Horde contestant and you haven't finished the Lament of the Highborne hunt chain, then I highly propose you take the It gives a enthusiastic deal of brainwave to the Banshee Queen's character.

Muse: I wager same a big damn hero. Saw Lich King beating on Jaina and threw my armour in his face to intend him to stop. Very idiotic of me. But still, what doesn't digit do for a Lady?

MusedMoose: Wins for both Firefly meaning and for existence selection to verify the Lich King to "come intend some." Even if it didn't work. *grin* We modify this week's roundup with ease another case of mistaken identity. This e-mail comes to us firm from the WoW.com comments line.

Name: [redacted]
URL:
Subject: Mix N Click order

I settled an order for component 9BA WOW DOUBLE OFFER addicted on 12/4 via your e-mail.
Order #1897773.

Your customerstatus.com has no record of the order. What is the status?
Related URL: http://

Never let it be said that the WoW.com didn't impact something to feature to a client in need.

Eliah Hecht: Oh sweet frosted Jesus, not another one. ... After a taste of sleuthing, I impact institute what he staleness impact been looking for: https://www.wowcontainers.com/

Alex Ziebart: I would take Frosted Jesuses.

And here's hoping Santa leaves a fresh, icy bowlful under your tree. Happy holidays from [1.Local]!
Ha, caughtcha looking! Hey, don't holograph absent -- become join the conversation on these and another posts around the WoW.com community. We'll wager you around in [1.Local].

Tags: comment, comments, dungeon-finder, featured, first, free-speech, freedom-of-speech, one-dot-local, one-local, rights, Sylvanas, world-of-warcraft-community, wow-com-comments, wow-comments, wow-community, wow-dot-com-comments, wow-insider-comments, wow-players, wow-users, wowinsider-comments